Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (05987c)

SITUATION A joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot treat a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement as incidental context on teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes. Contracts officer supporting a bid must close the SBIR data-rights assertions from that extract under Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements.

DECISION Contracts officer supporting a bid in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is noise around an already-controlled Compliance and Cyber Requirements process in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft, given teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes. 2. A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement is the event in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes that forces Pursue for contracts officer supporting a bid under Government RFP. 3. Teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes shows a one-file miss after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, not a Compliance and Cyber Requirements program failure. 4. Teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes cannot decide the SBIR data-rights assertions yet after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement; hold is the only Government RFP close a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches. 2. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 3. Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for contracts officer supporting a bid.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement). The follow-on Compliance and Cyber Requirements action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes, then the action for contracts officer supporting a bid - Hypothesis scorecard against teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Compliance and Cyber Requirements would cite