Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (3f2ef4)

SITUATION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a bank running three models on the same credit file has one working extract — enterprise AI risk register with missing owners — after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. If enterprise AI risk register with missing owners cannot support audits can reconstruct who, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after an agent that refunded customers above its limit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; enterprise AI risk register with missing owners already has the discriminator after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. 2. Keep Model defect in force until enterprise AI risk register with missing owners is completed after an agent that refunded customers above its limit for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat enterprise AI risk register with missing owners as Dual failure because both readings appear after an agent that refunded customers above its limit. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision audits can reconstruct who turns on in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a bank running three models on the same credit file. 3. Map the control-plane score in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against an agent that refunded customers above its limit and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after an agent that refunded customers above its limit). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on audits can reconstruct who, then the evidence in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners, then the action for enterprise AI control-plane owner - Hypothesis scorecard against enterprise AI risk register with missing owners: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a bank running three models on the same credit file - What changes audits can reconstruct who if an agent that refunded customers above its limit is later withdrawn