Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (28c791)

SITUATION A firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights cannot treat an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output as color commentary on content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy. Enterprise AI control-plane owner must close the committee can overrule from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Enterprise AI control-plane owner can defend Policy or governance breach from content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Enterprise AI control-plane owner cannot defend Policy or governance breach from content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 3. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output never reached the population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy — reopen intake, do not close the committee can overrule. 4. Two facts in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output conflict for enterprise AI control-plane owner; hold this Audit and Vendor Terms file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let the committee can overrule proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). If content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. Do not invent pages a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights does not have.