Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (b064e2)

SITUATION In a hospital committee that never records dissent, committee charter that does not define escalation is the only Lifecycle and Accountability extract after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file that enterprise AI control-plane owner can use for vendor terms allow customer. Enterprise AI control-plane owner has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close using committee charter that does not define escalation.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using committee charter that does not define escalation after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; committee charter that does not define escalation already has the discriminator after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 2. Keep Model defect in force until committee charter that does not define escalation is completed after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat committee charter that does not define escalation as Dual failure because both readings appear after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in committee charter that does not define escalation.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 3. Map the control-plane score in committee charter that does not define escalation to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.