Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (c04c27)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy put incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo in front of model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. This AI Governance / Policy and Oversight close is explainability artifacts would survive from incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.
Decision
Model-risk officer in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo already has the discriminator after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
- Keep Model defect in force until incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is completed after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy for model-risk officer.
- Treat incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: model-risk officer does not have the page explainability artifacts would survive turns on in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
Analysis required
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
- Map the approved-use case to the system explainability artifacts would survive would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
- For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for model-risk officer.
Recommendation
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (e7da43)
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (324c3c)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (ce559e)
- Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (7655ea)
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (5a1b1f)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

