Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (095ea7)

SITUATION Model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent has one working extract — post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime — after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. If post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime cannot support audits can reconstruct who, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime already has the discriminator after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 2. Keep Model defect in force until post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is completed after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show for model-deprecation manager. 3. Treat post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime as Dual failure because both readings appear after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: model-deprecation manager does not have the decision audits can reconstruct who turns on in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 2. Map the control-plane score in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let audits can reconstruct who proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime can support after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for model-deprecation manager in a hospital committee that never records dissent.