Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (454e84)

SITUATION In an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance, OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate is the evidence after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling. Capture manager has to pick Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming close using OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate.

DECISION Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance can accept Pursue on the SBIR data-rights assertions only from OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling, not from a neighboring Performance and Teaming file. 2. Pursue with conditions is the reading if OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling fails the Government RFP test capture manager would cite. 3. Partner stays open while OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate still contains both Pursue and Pursue with conditions signals. 4. Until OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling answers the SBIR data-rights assertions, capture manager should leave the Performance and Teaming close unnamed.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate to evaluator notes after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate against a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for capture manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what capture manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate, then the action for capture manager - Hypothesis scorecard against OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a CMMC assessor finding on CUI handling, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Performance and Teaming would cite