Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (f7c5e6)

SITUATION After a key person who just resigned, teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is what protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart can touch in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work. Government RFP will live with To bid as prime, sub, versus No-bid on this Protest and Modifications file.

DECISION Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work must choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A key person who just resigned is noise around an already-controlled Protest and Modifications process in a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work, given teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes. 2. A key person who just resigned is the event in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes that forces To bid as prime, sub, for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart under Government RFP. 3. Teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes shows a one-file miss after a key person who just resigned, not a Protest and Modifications program failure. 4. Teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes cannot decide to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid yet after a key person who just resigned; hold is the only Government RFP close a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a contractor evaluating a modification that looks like out-of-scope work cannot waive quietly. 2. Map Section L/M requirements in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned. 3. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches. 4. For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To bid as prime, sub, / No-bid on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Protest and Modifications action is what protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid, then the evidence in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes, then the action for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart - Hypothesis scorecard against teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes: supported / rejected / untestable - Protest and Modifications finding in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a key person who just resigned, if any