Assess whether the bid is compliant enough to survive a responsiveness check

SITUATION Past-performance volume owner is responsible for the bid is compliant in an incumbent defending a recompete, using thin past performance with past-performance recency and relevance scorecard as the only working extract. A key person who just resigned is what reset the timeline for this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as Pursue once a key person who just resigned is lined up to the same Government RFP population. 2. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Pursue with conditions after a key person who just resigned; Pursue would over-claim this Protest and Modifications extract. 3. Partner is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance. 4. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact past-performance volume owner needs after a key person who just resigned; stop this Government RFP close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches. 2. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the bid is compliant. 3. Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids. 4. For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move the bid is compliant for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a key person who just resigned). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a key person who just resigned, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for past-performance volume owner in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the bid is compliant, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the bid is compliant if a key person who just resigned is later withdrawn - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others