Assess whether monitoring detects drift or only outages (649d27)

SITUATION After a batch job still calling a retired endpoint, committee charter that does not define escalation is what post-deployment monitoring owner can touch in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. AI Governance Layer will live with Monitoring detects drift versus Only outages on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages using committee charter that does not define escalation after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Post-deployment monitoring owner can defend Monitoring detects drift from committee charter that does not define escalation after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Post-deployment monitoring owner cannot defend Monitoring detects drift from committee charter that does not define escalation; Only outages is what the extract actually supports after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint. 3. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint never reached the population in committee charter that does not define escalation — reopen intake, do not close monitoring detects drift or. 4. Two facts in committee charter that does not define escalation after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint conflict for post-deployment monitoring owner; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let monitoring detects drift or proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in committee charter that does not define escalation was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read committee charter that does not define escalation against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move monitoring detects drift or for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Monitoring detects drift / Only outages on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (committee charter that does not define escalation after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what post-deployment monitoring owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on monitoring detects drift or, then the evidence in committee charter that does not define escalation, then the action for post-deployment monitoring owner - Hypothesis scorecard against committee charter that does not define escalation: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for post-deployment monitoring owner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor - What changes monitoring detects drift or if a batch job still calling a retired endpoint is later withdrawn