Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (c01668)

SITUATION After a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted, multi-model disagreement log on production cases is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can touch in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases reads as Policy or governance breach once a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases is closer to Model defect after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in multi-model disagreement log on production cases for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. Multi-model disagreement log on production cases is missing the fact vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner needs after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in multi-model disagreement log on production cases was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in multi-model disagreement log on production cases to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). If multi-model disagreement log on production cases cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.