Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (99dea5)

SITUATION Post-deployment monitoring owner owns this Audit and Vendor Terms review in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is the triggering event; agent permissioning that allows external side effects is the evidence for whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agent permissioning that allows external side effects after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects reads as Policy or governance breach once an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is closer to Model defect after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in agent permissioning that allows external side effects for post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 4. Agent permissioning that allows external side effects is missing the fact post-deployment monitoring owner needs after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in agent permissioning that allows external side effects was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in agent permissioning that allows external side effects to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read agent permissioning that allows external side effects against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (agent permissioning that allows external side effects after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). If agent permissioning that allows external side effects cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If agent permissioning that allows external side effects after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, post-deployment monitoring owner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.