Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (59d90f)

SITUATION The working file is decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. Post-deployment monitoring owner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. Drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Policy or governance breach for post-deployment monitoring owner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. 2. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, post-deployment monitoring owner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.