Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (05b509)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
An examiner request for the current model inventory put incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo in front of EU AI Act implementation manager in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents. This AI Governance / Bias and Training Data close is the system is high-risk from incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.
Decision
EU AI Act implementation manager in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
Hypotheses to test
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo reads as Policy or governance breach once an examiner request for the current model inventory is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is closer to Model defect after an examiner request for the current model inventory; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Bias and Training Data extract.
- Dual failure is still live in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo for EU AI Act implementation manager in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents.
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is missing the fact EU AI Act implementation manager needs after an examiner request for the current model inventory; stop this AI Governance close.
Analysis required
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for EU AI Act implementation manager.
Recommendation
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (ad2710)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (01aab2)
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (fdf475)
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

