Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (23dd66)

Situation

After a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure, post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is what multi-model reconciliation lead can touch in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

Decision

Multi-model reconciliation lead in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime already has the discriminator after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Keep Model defect in force until post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime is completed after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure for multi-model reconciliation lead.
• Treat post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime as Dual failure because both readings appear after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure.
• Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the page audits can reconstruct who turns on in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime.

Analysis required

• Score whether the agent action in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions.
• Map the control-plane score in post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime against a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for multi-model reconciliation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure). If post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Lifecycle and Accountability, stop. If post-deployment monitoring that only tracks uptime after a customer discovering AI copy with no disclosure cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability close, multi-model reconciliation lead must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.