Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights after two

SITUATION Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file put enterprise AI risk register with missing owners in front of vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. This AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring close is procurement should fail a from enterprise AI risk register with missing owners, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can defend Policy or governance breach from enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner cannot defend Policy or governance breach from enterprise AI risk register with missing owners; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 3. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file never reached the population in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners — reopen intake, do not close procurement should fail a. 4. Two facts in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file conflict for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner; hold this Control Plane and Scoring file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). If enterprise AI risk register with missing owners cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Control Plane and Scoring, stop. Do not invent missing evidence an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor does not have.