Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (c1d8d3)

SITUATION A live AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor now turns on deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner should state what that extract proves for whether vendor terms allow customer data in training.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job already has the discriminator after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 2. Keep Model defect in force until deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is completed after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner. 3. Treat deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job as Dual failure because both readings appear after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does not have the decision vendor terms allow customer turns on in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). If deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Control Plane and Scoring, stop. Do not invent missing evidence an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor does not have.