Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (f69e64)

SITUATION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a bank running three models on the same credit file has one working extract — deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job — after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. If deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job cannot support audits can reconstruct who, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job already has the discriminator after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 2. Keep Model defect in force until deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job is completed after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted for enterprise AI control-plane owner. 3. Treat deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job as Dual failure because both readings appear after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: enterprise AI control-plane owner does not have the decision audits can reconstruct who turns on in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let audits can reconstruct who proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job against a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted and write the one fact that would move audits can reconstruct who for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job after a purchase order signed before eval data rights were granted). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what enterprise AI control-plane owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on audits can reconstruct who, then the evidence in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job, then the action for enterprise AI control-plane owner - Hypothesis scorecard against deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Control Plane and Scoring would cite - Control Plane and Scoring finding in deprecation plan for a model still in a batch job that a second reviewer can re-perform