Assess whether condemnation rates imply a quality escape (7a4557)

SITUATION The working file is repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA has to name Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION NSN research lead in a depot whose parts master does not match DLA must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. NSN research lead can defend Fund and move materiel from repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. NSN research lead cannot defend Fund and move materiel from repair-history file that will not tie to cost; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. 3. A mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN never reached the population in repair-history file that will not tie to cost — reopen intake, do not close condemnation rates imply a. 4. Two facts in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN conflict for NSN research lead; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN and write the one fact that would move condemnation rates imply a for NSN research lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what NSN research lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on condemnation rates imply a, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for NSN research lead - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in repair-history file that will not tie to cost that a second reviewer can re-perform