Assess whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk (5c51b3)

SITUATION The working file is unpriced contractual action aging list after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN. Depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN has to name Fund and move materiel or Cannibalize or substitute for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Depot procurement-intelligence analyst in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN is noise around an already-controlled Depot Procurement Intelligence process in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN, given unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. A mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN is the event in unpriced contractual action aging list that forces Fund and move materiel for depot procurement-intelligence analyst under Defense Sustainment. 3. Unpriced contractual action aging list shows a one-file miss after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN, not a Depot Procurement Intelligence program failure. 4. Unpriced contractual action aging list cannot decide a DMSMS hit is yet after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN; hold is the only Defense Sustainment close an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN and write the one fact that would move a DMSMS hit is for depot procurement-intelligence analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Depot procurement-intelligence analyst should take Cannibalize or substitute on a DMSMS hit is unless unpriced contractual action aging list after a mission-capable rate drop tied to one NSN already proves Fund and move materiel for this Depot Procurement Intelligence packet in an ALC working a shortage on a high-demand NSN. Keep Defer a cycle live only while unpriced contractual action aging list is missing the decision a DMSMS hit is turns on. The working test on unpriced contractual action aging list is whether Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual ac.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on a DMSMS hit is, then the evidence in unpriced contractual action aging list, then the action for depot procurement-intelligence analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against unpriced contractual action aging list: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Depot Procurement Intelligence would cite - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in unpriced contractual action aging list that a second reviewer can re-perform