Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log after a vendor that

SITUATION A regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions cannot treat a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice as incidental context on decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. AI committee secretariat must close disagreement should block, queue, from that extract under AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step already has the discriminator after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 2. Keep Log in force until decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is completed after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice for AI committee secretariat. 3. Treat decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: AI committee secretariat does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a regulated entity that cannot reconstruct last month's decisions. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Control Plane and Scoring file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Control Plane and Scoring packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Control Plane and Scoring action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on disagreement should block, queue,, then the evidence in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step, then the action for AI committee secretariat - Hypothesis scorecard against decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Control Plane and Scoring would cite - Control Plane and Scoring finding in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that a second reviewer can re-perform