Assess whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk (5337a1)

SITUATION DLA item manager's data counterpart at a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data is reviewing unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. The question on that extract is whether a DMSMS hit is already a stock-out risk. The packet does not yet prove Fund and move materiel versus Cannibalize or substitute.

DECISION DLA item manager's data counterpart in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. DLA item manager's data counterpart can defend Fund and move materiel from unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. DLA item manager's data counterpart cannot defend Fund and move materiel from unpriced contractual action aging list; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 3. A OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock never reached the population in unpriced contractual action aging list — reopen intake, do not close a DMSMS hit is. 4. Two facts in unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock conflict for DLA item manager's data counterpart; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Quantify mission impact if a DMSMS hit is is deferred one cycle in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data. 2. Reconcile depot demand in unpriced contractual action aging list to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock. 3. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move unpriced contractual action aging list. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read unpriced contractual action aging list against a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock and write the one fact that would move a DMSMS hit is for DLA item manager's data counterpart.

RECOMMENDATION On this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence decision, bind Fund and move materiel to unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock: if unpriced contractual action aging list supports it, DLA item manager's data counterpart executes Fund and move materiel in a contracting shop mapping vendors from file-first data and logs the owner. If unpriced contractual action aging list instead fits Cannibalize or substitute, take that path. Where unpriced contractual action aging list after a OEM end-of-life notice with 90 days of stock is silent, DLA item manager's data counterpart must do not move materiel or funding on a count the depot file cannot reconstruct.