Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam from incident
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a retailer using generative AI in customer service has one working extract — incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo — after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty. If incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo cannot support explainability artifacts would survive, the honest AI Governance output is hold.
Decision
Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
Hypotheses to test
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo reads as Policy or governance breach once an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is closer to Model defect after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Inventory and Regulatory Fit extract.
- Dual failure is still live in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a retailer using generative AI in customer service.
- Incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is missing the fact vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools needs after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty; stop this AI Governance close.
Analysis required
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
- Reproduce the incident row in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (ad609f)
- Whether human review is real or a rubber stamp from generative-AI
- Board AI liaison must resolve whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI
- Whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit from training-data
- Whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from board literacy
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

