Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (070b6d)

SITUATION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model has one working extract — hiring-tool adverse-impact tables — after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. If hiring-tool adverse-impact tables cannot support the hiring tool should, the only defensible AI Governance output is hold.

DECISION Exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Hiring-tool adverse-impact tables reads as Policy or governance breach once a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region is lined up to the same AI Governance population. 2. Hiring-tool adverse-impact tables is closer to Model defect after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables for exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model. 4. Hiring-tool adverse-impact tables is missing the fact exam-readiness coordinator needs after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region; stop this AI Governance close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the approved-use case to the system the hiring tool should would bind. 2. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. 3. Map the approved-use case to the system the hiring tool should would bind. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read hiring-tool adverse-impact tables against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for exam-readiness coordinator.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what exam-readiness coordinator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables, then the action for exam-readiness coordinator - Hypothesis scorecard against hiring-tool adverse-impact tables: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for exam-readiness coordinator in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model