Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk

Situation

The Performance and Teaming desk packet is teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement. Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must name Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP file. Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP has to name Pursue or Pursue with conditions for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.

Hypotheses to test

• Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart can defend Pursue from teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement in a Government RFP challenge.
• Protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart cannot defend Pursue from teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes; Pursue with conditions is what the extract actually supports after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• A teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement never reached the population in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes — reopen intake, do not close key personnel substitutions will.
• Two facts in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement conflict for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart; hold this Performance and Teaming file.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes to evaluator notes after a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a teammate that cannot meet the facility-clearance requirement and write the one fact that would move key personnel substitutions will for protest-risk counsel's technical counterpart.