Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (931d01)

SITUATION Model-deprecation manager is responsible for procurement should fail a in a bank running three models on the same credit file, using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as the only working extract. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is what reset the timeline for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION Model-deprecation manager in a bank running three models on the same credit file must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality already has the discriminator after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 2. Keep Model defect in force until reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is completed after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output for model-deprecation manager. 3. Treat reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as Dual failure because both readings appear after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: model-deprecation manager does not have the decision procurement should fail a turns on in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a bank running three models on the same credit file. 2. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate model-deprecation manager can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for model-deprecation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what model-deprecation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on procurement should fail a, then the evidence in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality, then the action for model-deprecation manager - Hypothesis scorecard against reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Lifecycle and Accountability would cite