Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (b217fb)

SITUATION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate has one working extract — content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy — after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. If content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy cannot support procurement should fail a, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Decision-audit designer can defend Policy or governance breach from content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice in a AI Governance Layer challenge. 2. Decision-audit designer cannot defend Policy or governance breach from content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. 3. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice never reached the population in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy — reopen intake, do not close procurement should fail a. 4. Two facts in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice conflict for decision-audit designer; hold this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a company whose agents can send email without a gate. 2. Map the control-plane score in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy to the policy gate decision-audit designer can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for decision-audit designer in a company whose agents can send email without a gate.