Assess whether a retailer should be disqualified (0b9633)

Situation

Housing-subsidy fraud investigator owns a retailer should be disqualified inside a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households with identity-proofing exception queue as the only packet. A CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is what changed the clock for this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file.

Decision

Housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

Hypotheses to test

• The population in identity-proofing exception queue is the one a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE named, so Pay or continue follows for this Recoupment and Policy file.
• The population in identity-proofing exception queue is adjacent only to a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; Recoup is the honest Public Benefits call.
• A housing authority with overlapping subsidy households already contained a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE before identity-proofing exception queue arrived; no new Recoupment and Policy path.
• Provenance on identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is broken; do not pick Pay or continue or Recoup yet.

Analysis required

• Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households.
• Match household facts in identity-proofing exception queue to the rule that pays the benefit.
• Trace the notice and appeal path housing-subsidy fraud investigator must preserve.
• For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read identity-proofing exception queue against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move a retailer should be disqualified for housing-subsidy fraud investigator.

Recommendation

Choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). Lead with the Public Benefits option identity-proofing exception queue can support after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for housing-subsidy fraud investigator in a housing authority with overlapping subsidy households.