Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (ee9cae)

SITUATION After a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS, SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix is the working evidence for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. Decide whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive using only what SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix actually supports.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix reads as Pursue once a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is lined up to the same Government RFP population. 2. SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix is closer to Pursue with conditions after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; Pursue would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract. 3. Partner is still live in SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. 4. SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix is missing the fact past-performance volume owner needs after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; stop this Government RFP close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix attaches. 2. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 3. Score competitive posture if past-performance volume owner pursues, partners, or no-bids. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what past-performance volume owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against SBIR Phase II commercialization appendix: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Pursue, Pursue with conditions, Partner and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft