Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (f48075)

Situation

An incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot treat a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS as color commentary on past-performance recency and relevance scorecard. CMMC implementation lead must close Section M scoring math from that extract under Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

Hypotheses to test

• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as Pursue once a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Pursue with conditions after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; Pursue would over-claim this Compliance and Cyber Requirements extract.
• Partner is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for CMMC implementation lead in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.
• Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact CMMC implementation lead needs after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance cannot waive quietly.
• Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches.
• For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move Section M scoring math for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). Lead with the Government RFP option past-performance recency and relevance scorecard can support after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for CMMC implementation lead in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.