Is System High-risk Under the EU AI Act?
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
A drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal put generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft in front of HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm. This AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit close is the system is high-risk from generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.
Decision
HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft already has the discriminator after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.
- Keep Model defect in force until generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft is completed after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal for HR analytics governance lead.
- Treat generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft as Dual failure because both readings appear after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: HR analytics governance lead does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft.
Analysis required
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate HR analytics governance lead can actually point to.
- Walk the model input/output path recorded in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
- Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate HR analytics governance lead can actually point to.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft against a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for HR analytics governance lead.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal). Lead with the AI Governance option generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft can support after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for HR analytics governance lead in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp after a vendor SOC
- Whether training data has a lawful basis and documented lineage
- Assess whether the board has been accurately briefed from generative-AI
- Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from EU AI Act
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

