Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (587326)

SITUATION In an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model, a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region put hiring-tool adverse-impact tables in play. EU AI Act implementation manager should decide whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act without filling gaps hiring-tool adverse-impact tables does not contain.

DECISION EU AI Act implementation manager in an insurer scoring claims with a third-party model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; hiring-tool adverse-impact tables already has the discriminator after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. 2. Keep Model defect in force until hiring-tool adverse-impact tables is completed after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region for EU AI Act implementation manager. 3. Treat hiring-tool adverse-impact tables as Dual failure because both readings appear after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: EU AI Act implementation manager does not have the decision the system is high-risk turns on in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. 2. Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind. 3. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read hiring-tool adverse-impact tables against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for EU AI Act implementation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region). The follow-on Policy and Oversight action is what EU AI Act implementation manager does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager - Hypothesis scorecard against hiring-tool adverse-impact tables: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite