Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (0c3c2f)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The system is high-risk sits with privacy counsel supporting AI inventory because a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy hit a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor. Evidence is post-deployment drift report the owner never signed; write the AI Governance Bias and Training Data option that extract can carry.
Decision
Privacy counsel supporting AI inventory in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy.
Hypotheses to test
- A customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy is noise around an already-controlled Bias and Training Data process in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor, given post-deployment drift report the owner never signed.
- A customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy is the event in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed that forces Policy or governance breach for privacy counsel supporting AI inventory under AI Governance.
- Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed shows a one-file miss after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy, not a Bias and Training Data program failure.
- Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot decide the system is high-risk yet after a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy; hold is the only AI Governance close a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor can defend.
Analysis required
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed.
- Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data.
- Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed.
- For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a customer complaint that a chatbot invented a refund policy and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for privacy counsel supporting AI inventory.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (6860a6)
- Assess whether the vendor can be used in a regulated process (322ffe)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (aaa789)
- Assess whether human review is real or a rubber stamp (8ffb78)
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (bf9012)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

