Assess whether to price to win or walk from a buy-in (772843)

SITUATION A key person who just resigned put contract-mod scope creep log in front of past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft. This Government RFP / Performance and Teaming close is to price to win or walk from contract-mod scope creep log, and the live options are To price to win, Walk from a buy-in.

DECISION Past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in using contract-mod scope creep log after a key person who just resigned.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A key person who just resigned is noise around an already-controlled Performance and Teaming process in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft, given contract-mod scope creep log. 2. A key person who just resigned is the event in contract-mod scope creep log that forces To price to win for past-performance volume owner under Government RFP. 3. Contract-mod scope creep log shows a one-file miss after a key person who just resigned, not a Performance and Teaming program failure. 4. Contract-mod scope creep log cannot decide to price to win or walk yet after a key person who just resigned; hold is the only Government RFP close a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft cannot waive quietly. 2. Map Section L/M requirements in contract-mod scope creep log to evaluator notes after a key person who just resigned. 3. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what contract-mod scope creep log attaches. 4. For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read contract-mod scope creep log against a key person who just resigned and write the one fact that would move to price to win or walk for past-performance volume owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To price to win / Walk from a buy-in on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (contract-mod scope creep log after a key person who just resigned). The follow-on Performance and Teaming action is what past-performance volume owner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on to price to win or walk, then the evidence in contract-mod scope creep log, then the action for past-performance volume owner - Hypothesis scorecard against contract-mod scope creep log: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for past-performance volume owner in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft - What changes to price to win or walk if a key person who just resigned is later withdrawn