Assess whether to recoup, waive, or refer for prosecution (8462e8)

SITUATION In a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave, identity-proofing exception queue is the evidence after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE. TANF work-requirement monitor has to pick To recoup, waive, or Refer for prosecution for this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy close using identity-proofing exception queue.

DECISION TANF work-requirement monitor in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave must choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution using identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in identity-proofing exception queue is the one a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE named, so To recoup, waive, follows for this Recoupment and Policy file. 2. The population in identity-proofing exception queue is adjacent only to a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE; Refer for prosecution is the honest Public Benefits call. 3. A state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave already contained a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE before identity-proofing exception queue arrived; no new Recoupment and Policy path. 4. Provenance on identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is broken; do not pick To recoup, waive, or Refer for prosecution yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Separate a case-level error from a program-design failure in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave. 2. Match household facts in identity-proofing exception queue to the rule that pays the benefit. 3. Trace the notice and appeal path TANF work-requirement monitor must preserve. 4. For this Public Benefits Recoupment and Policy file, read identity-proofing exception queue against a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE and write the one fact that would move to recoup, waive, or refer for TANF work-requirement monitor.

RECOMMENDATION Choose To recoup, waive, / Refer for prosecution on this Public Benefits / Recoupment and Policy packet (identity-proofing exception queue after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE). Lead with the Public Benefits option identity-proofing exception queue can support after a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for TANF work-requirement monitor in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Public Benefits option on to recoup, waive, or refer, then the evidence in identity-proofing exception queue, then the action for TANF work-requirement monitor - Hypothesis scorecard against identity-proofing exception queue: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for TANF work-requirement monitor in a state SNAP agency after an EBT skimming wave - What changes to recoup, waive, or refer if a CDR where treating-source evidence conflicts with a CE is later withdrawn