Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (d97fe6)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
The desk packet is earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a peg set at a seasonal high. Customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target has to name Proceed or Reprice for this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file.
Decision
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a peg set at a seasonal high.
Hypotheses to test
- Earnout metric definitions that invite dispute reads as Proceed once a peg set at a seasonal high is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Earnout metric definitions that invite dispute is closer to Reprice after a peg set at a seasonal high; Proceed would over-claim this Legal, IP, and Regulatory extract.
- Walk is still live in earnout metric definitions that invite dispute for customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target.
- Earnout metric definitions that invite dispute is missing the fact customer-contract risk reviewer needs after a peg set at a seasonal high; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Name the document customer-contract risk reviewer still needs before signing.
- Test whether a peg set at a seasonal high is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- Separate a one-off add-back from a recurring earnings issue in earnout metric definitions that invite dispute.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read earnout metric definitions that invite dispute against a peg set at a seasonal high and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for customer-contract risk reviewer.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (earnout metric definitions that invite dispute after a peg set at a seasonal high). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option earnout metric definitions that invite dispute can support after a peg set at a seasonal high, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (c617f6)
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (2a0721)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (13627e)
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (2a3d1d)
- Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (7dd38b)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether books should be restated or merely adjustedForensic Accounting
- Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (b755a7)Government RFP
- Assess whether bonus triggers were gamed by cutoff (f6a660)Forensic Accounting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

