Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (974637)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
An earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary put working-capital peg versus seasonal reality in front of customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target. This M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory close is a top customer is actually sticky from working-capital peg versus seasonal reality, and the live options are Proceed, Reprice, Walk.
Decision
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary.
Hypotheses to test
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality reads as Proceed once an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary is lined up to the same M&A Due Diligence population.
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is closer to Reprice after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary; Proceed would over-claim this Legal, IP, and Regulatory extract.
- Walk is still live in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality for customer-contract risk reviewer in a family-office reviewing a manufacturing target.
- Working-capital peg versus seasonal reality is missing the fact customer-contract risk reviewer needs after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary; stop this M&A Due Diligence close.
Analysis required
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in working-capital peg versus seasonal reality to a top customer is actually sticky.
- Name the document customer-contract risk reviewer still needs before signing.
- Test whether an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary is a diligence gap, a price chip, or a walk-away.
- For this M&A Due Diligence Legal, IP, and Regulatory file, read working-capital peg versus seasonal reality against an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for customer-contract risk reviewer.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / Legal, IP, and Regulatory packet (working-capital peg versus seasonal reality after an earnout based on 'adjusted EBITDA' with no dictionary). The follow-on Legal, IP, and Regulatory action is what customer-contract risk reviewer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (7541e0)
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (ae09c8)
- Assess whether IP is owned or merely licensed (1f95b2)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight from IP
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (393c74)
Explore related decision areas
- Does Inventory Exist, or Only On Paper — Public Filer FacingForensic Accounting
- Assess whether to non-renew a deteriorating book segment (f14233)Insurance Underwriting
- Whether pollution coverage should be site-specific or blanket from propertyInsurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

