Assess whether unpriced actions should be stopped (d5476e)

SITUATION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst is responsible for unpriced actions should be stopped in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract, using BOM that still lists a cancelled spec as the only working extract. A new source that has never made this form-fit-function is what reset the timeline for this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using BOM that still lists a cancelled spec after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst can defend Fund and move materiel from BOM that still lists a cancelled spec after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function in a Defense Sustainment challenge. 2. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst cannot defend Fund and move materiel from BOM that still lists a cancelled spec; Cannibalize or substitute is what the extract actually supports after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. 3. A new source that has never made this form-fit-function never reached the population in BOM that still lists a cancelled spec — reopen intake, do not close unpriced actions should be stopped. 4. Two facts in BOM that still lists a cancelled spec after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function conflict for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst; hold this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Reconcile depot demand in BOM that still lists a cancelled spec to fleet readiness and NSN coverage after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function. 2. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move BOM that still lists a cancelled spec. 3. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read BOM that still lists a cancelled spec against a new source that has never made this form-fit-function and write the one fact that would move unpriced actions should be stopped for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION A workload that shifted from organic repair to contract needs a named owner on unpriced actions should be stopped. Assign obsolescence and DMSMS analyst to execute Fund and move materiel when BOM that still lists a cancelled spec after a new source that has never made this form-fit-function is complete, or Cannibalize or substitute when the Depot Procurement Intelligence packet still lacks the discriminator in BOM that still lists a cancelled spec.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on unpriced actions should be stopped, then the evidence in BOM that still lists a cancelled spec, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against BOM that still lists a cancelled spec: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes unpriced actions should be stopped if a new source that has never made this form-fit-function is later withdrawn - Named option among Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle and the fact that kills the others