Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one (3052d2)
August 31, 2026
SITUATION A health-system acquiring a specialty practice cannot treat add-backs that are just delayed opex as incidental context on environmental known-condition schedule. Carve-out separation lead must close the carve-out is operable from that extract under M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts.
DECISION Carve-out separation lead in a health-system acquiring a specialty practice must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using environmental known-condition schedule after add-backs that are just delayed opex.
HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Proceed now; environmental known-condition schedule already has the discriminator after add-backs that are just delayed opex. 2. Keep Reprice in force until environmental known-condition schedule is completed after add-backs that are just delayed opex for carve-out separation lead. 3. Treat environmental known-condition schedule as Walk because both readings appear after add-backs that are just delayed opex. 4. Refuse a M&A Due Diligence close: carve-out separation lead does not have the decision the carve-out is operable turns on in environmental known-condition schedule.
ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a health-system acquiring a specialty practice would inherit. 2. Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in environmental known-condition schedule to the carve-out is operable. 3. Name the document carve-out separation lead still needs before signing. 4. For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read environmental known-condition schedule against add-backs that are just delayed opex and write the one fact that would move the carve-out is operable for carve-out separation lead.
RECOMMENDATION Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (environmental known-condition schedule after add-backs that are just delayed opex). The follow-on People and Contracts action is what carve-out separation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line M&A Due Diligence option on the carve-out is operable, then the evidence in environmental known-condition schedule, then the action for carve-out separation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against environmental known-condition schedule: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the carve-out is operable if add-backs that are just delayed opex is later withdrawn - Named option among Proceed, Reprice, Walk and the fact that kills the others
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether environmental liability is capped or open-ended (c79785)
- Whether earnings quality supports the bid price from earnout metric
- Assess whether management can run this without the founder (a67f29)
- Assess whether earnout definitions will cause a post-close fight (e7e3d7)
- Whether working capital should be a walk-away from regulatory-approval
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

