Assess whether training data has a lawful basis and documented lineage

SITUATION Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools has one working extract — EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet — after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. If EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet cannot support training data has a, the only defensible AI Governance output is hold.

DECISION Vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Policy or governance breach now; EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet already has the discriminator after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. 2. Keep Model defect in force until EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is completed after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools. 3. Treat EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet as Dual failure because both readings appear after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal. 4. Refuse a AI Governance close: vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools does not have the decision training data has a turns on in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools can actually point to. 2. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 3. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools can actually point to. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal and write the one fact that would move training data has a for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal). Lead with the AI Governance option EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet can support after a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools in a manufacturer piloting shop-floor copilot tools.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on training data has a, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for vendor-diligence reviewer for AI tools - Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes training data has a if a drift alert the product owner dismissed as seasonal is later withdrawn - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others